Archive - Staff Posts RSS Feed

Bills, Children, and a Dream of Poetry

Tania Runyan

Guest Poetry Editor Tania Runyan pursues an alternative dream to the “American” variety.

A few months ago, one of my ACT prep students, a high school junior, shared his concerns about the future. Having grown up designing buildings out of Legos, he had always dreamed of architecture. Now, with today’s job forecasts, he has succumbed to the depressing outlook for architects and is trying to make peace with another area of study–biomedical engineering. “I was born to build,” he said. “But it won’t work for me.” On the outside, I listened carefully and nodded. Inside, I wanted to hurl a taupe chair through the library window. How have we reached a pass where a seventeen-year-old must abandon his dreams before even getting started? What do we say to kids who get starry-eyed around librarians and radio announcers, to education majors packing their bags for their parents’ basements as even tenured elementary teachers lose their jobs?

As a child and teen, I never entertained—much less understood—the state of the economy. People grew up to do what they wanted to do, and somehow food and houses magically appeared. I said I wanted to be a writer, so that’s what I did, what I aspired to, without apology. At an amusement park, a caricaturist drew a picture of me sitting at a typewriter with a long braid and glasses, the words “Pulitzer Prize” in a dreamy thought bubble. Well, duh, I thought. My childhood is pretty much summed up by a cardboard box full of animal stories and writing awards. Sure, I went through my brief zookeeper phase when our house ran amok with pets, and even in college I took a little detour into child development, but I’ve always come back to writing.

Perhaps it is so typically American, so Jay Gatsby, of me to presume that we deserve to pursue our dreams, to even dabble in the idea of dreams, when the great majority of people in the world struggle to keep their hearts beating one more day. But I believe God gifts us with talents that we can never fully untangle from our souls. My mother didn’t pursue what could have been a promising art career, but she also never fully let it go. Perhaps unconsciously, she has allowed her artistic genius to inform nearly every area of her life: decorating her house like a sumptuous museum, turning a daycare classroom into a wonderland of handcrafted leaves, spiders and bats, and now, at the age of 76, quietly spending her days creating miniscule flowers from Post-its for her quarter-inch scale Victorian greenhouses.

Likewise, the derailed counselor who finds himself in a cubicle will often wander to the coffee pot to ask his coworkers the truly probing questions. The chef-turned-pastor will find as many excuses for potlucks as possible. And as the job market continues to narrow, those not spiritually gifted in home health care or large animal veterinary studies will find themselves largely denying their identities in the work place while seeking to nurture their gifts elsewhere.

Like writers. And, Lord help us, the poets, who have been given (thanks a lot, God) one of the most impractical, unwanted gifts of all. It’s debatable whether I have a gift, but I’m better at poetry than just about anything else, and whenever I take on a job that prevents my writing (like when I taught high school English–a job I loved but that precluded any other activities in my life), life feels “off,” like I’ve shut my ears to the Spirit. I know poetry doesn’t bring in the dough. I know it’s ridiculous that I feel like J.K. Rowling when my book reaches 98,000 on Amazon. But when I refuse to give my writing the time, the thought, the painstakingly slow chiseling of words, I am telling my Creator that he made a mistake, that his decision to indwell me with a passion for words at birth was quaint but not worthy of my attention, because, well, it’s not worthy of many people’s attention.

But is God bound by economy, time, or culture? Does he have to follow the rules of what works in the world? The idea of an “audience of one,” has grown tired, I know, but it rings truer to me every day that I write. Yes, I write for others. I want to reach people and make them think, feel, or pray in a different way. But whether one, one hundred, or one thousand (astounding for a poetry book) sell, or whether there is a book at all, is of little consequence when I realize I’m developing my talents for eternal use. We know that today there are too many writers and not enough readers. But can there be too many poets in a place like heaven?

It’s not off-base to recommend that writers put a few practical plans in place. There will be bills and children. While earning two writing degrees, I ensured I also got experience in publishing and teaching, and I have never been without enjoyable employment in some sort of English-related field. But in making any choice about career, church, or “free time,” the artist, who will usually have to pursue his or her gifts outside of the regular work day, will have to prioritize the time to create. If you’re called to writing, it’s not just another hobby, like a quick game of Angry Birds. It’s a slow, sacred unfolding of whom God created you to be. Give it room.

Tania Runyan‘s latest book, One Thousand Vessels, was recently published by WordFarm Press. She is currently working on a new book of poems based on Paul’s epistles under a grant from the NEA.

In Flames We Trust

In Flames

After surviving a heavy metal concert, Lyle Enright reflects on what God was up to in the meantime. 

“As soon as I say, ‘F—ing explode,’ I want all you motherf—ers to f—ing explode!!”

This was the exhortation Matt Heafy gave to us as he closed out the set with his band, Trivium, last month at the Chicago House of Blues during the last night of the Sounds of a Playground Fading tour, headed up by Swedish heavy metal band In Flames.

And by “‘effing’ explode,” he meant for all of us in the audience to begin throwing ourselves at each other as hard as we could. Which we did. Jubilantly.

For everything that heavy metal has ever been known for, ‘restraint’ has never been one of those things, and this applies thematically as well as socially. “Do I end this all for the world to see?” Trivium asks on their newest album, In Waves. “I know that death approaches fast – What’s the purpose if this life won’t last? Pulling everyone down with me.”

No one, of course, is thinking about the metaphysical implications of such questions in the moment, but they do enjoy the “pulling everyone down with me” part. To be in the middle of an authentic modern metal concert is to participate in a hurricane of bodies and limbs. I earned my tour shirt, and by the end of the night it was covered in blood, sweat and tears. And booze. And spit. And tobacco. And pot.

“So…there is no ‘God’ part to this?” (Yes, I can hear you.)

It seems as though this sort of event, this sort of place, would be where you check God in at the door and leave him there while you go and have a good time. This is certainly what most of us do on a regular basis with far less ‘questionable’ activities. “My way is hidden, my cause is disregarded by my God,” we may be tempted to say with Job in order to justify ourselves, secretly hoping that it’s true and all the while knowing that it’s not.

But I’d been there before. I know what it’s like to think in those terms, so this time I decided to try an experiment: Let’s take Brother Lawrence up on his challenge and practice the presence of the Almighty while in the middle of something that otherwise seems so unwelcoming to him.

The truth is: He’ll follow you anywhere.

It’s a surprising experience, letting yourself get carried away like that. You wind up finding things you would never have expected – the huge smiles you get from people in the mosh pit, the ones who will pick you up and set you out of the way to catch your breath just after they’ve knocked you down, those who don’t even know your name but will seek you out throughout the show to make sure you’re alright and haven’t broken a rib yet. And the occasional drunk dude who adopts you as his best friend for the evening but is still very, very nice about it.

These are the sorts of things no one expects from something like the heavy metal community. There is the pervasive (and not unwarranted) assumption of misanthropy and resignation to Hellfire, but ultimately these people are just like you and me. Or you can argue that I’m just like them and nothing like you, and to that I intend to heap burning coals on your head by replying, “I receive that, brother (or sister; I’ll cover my bases).”

The point is, they don’t hate each other, they don’t hate you, they don’t want to hate you – they’re looking for redemption, just like you and I are. We all need redemption. This is the way they’ve gone about it and somehow, sometimes, they think they’ve found it. They at least believe they’ve found someone who’s asking the right questions. And here they’d be right.

“I won’t let the world break me, so I need to change direction. Nothing special, I’m far from perfect – Light the way for me!” sang Anders Frieden as he and In Flames performed the song ‘Where The Dead Ships Dwell’ off their new album, Sounds of a Playground Fading. Now that isn’t exactly a cry of “Hail Satan!” or a moan of self-pity and alienation.

For twenty years, In Flames have been consistently writing songs that lead their fans to ask questions about bigger things, and to look outside themselves for the answers. None of the members make any statement of faith, but the sense of social responsibility and the need for rescue and reconciliation that comes through in their lyrics is unmissable.

“Fear is the weakness in all of us,” they insist on the same album. “It’s not meant to be easy but you drag us down; burden of the evidence grows… Faith has been denied, let’s not pretend this is the first time we just don’t belong.”

Clearly, there are others out there who see that faith should be a necessary part of our lives. They’re out there, making the claims and asking the questions – loudly, and from the stage – and leading thousands of others to ask them too; people we wouldn’t necessarily think even cared about things like that.

But In Flames was who we all came to hear that night, and many went to hear the words of a God they don’t know sung by voices that they did. And the Word isn’t picky about who shares him, or where.

“If I ever, if I never, make me understand the thought, whatever,” Frieden and company sang to close the night, and I prayed right along with them: “Make me see, make me be, make me understand you’re there for me: Take this life, I’m right here; stay a while and breathe me in.”

“As the rain and the snow come down from heaven, and do not return to it without watering the earth and making it bud and flourish, so that it yields seed for the sower and bread for the eater, so is my word that goes out from my mouth: It will not return to me empty, but will accomplish what I desire and achieve the purpose for which I sent it.” Isaiah 55:10-11

Lyle Enright is an editorial intern with Relief and will graduate from Trinity International University with a degree in English this May. 

The Gospel According to Cormac McCarthy, or, What’s Greek for “bad news”?

 

Cormac McCarthy

This was posted on the Gospel Coalition blog earlier this month and I am grateful to the author, Mike Cosper, for several reasons. Firstly, it is great to see that in a blog consisting of posts by various theologians, pastors, and church leaders there is still some recognition of the significant role that literature has even in our current culture (and everyone with Relief said “Amen”). Despite the apparent conflict between certain subsets of Christianity and mainstream art, there are those of us who are willing to affirm the potential use of the latter in the service of the former. Coincidentally, this brings me to my second reason for gratitude: Cosper’s emphasis on the consequential role of Cormac McCarthy in both the development of the history of American Literature and individual (and potentially Christian) readers.

At the end of his post Cosper quotes something John Piper wrote on Twitter, “Cormac McCarthy is to the American literary canon what Judges is to the biblical canon.” I remember considering the aptness of that tweet myself some months ago. What book of the Bible is McCarthy most like? If that question had been posed to me, I would have suggested Ecclesiastes, but as I have been working through Judges in a study with a group from my church, I see the connection.

Let me give you some of my own context. While I am not particularly well versed in contemporary fiction, Cormac McCarthy is perhaps my favorite living author, and among my favorite authors of all time. I first encountered his work in high school when The Road was published. I read the entire book in one afternoon. Since then I have worked through his other novels, but at a much slower pace. If I have done my math correctly (insert English-major joke here), I have read 10 of his 13 published works. Simply put, there is something I find deeply appealing in his writings.

Cosper does a very neat job of outlining the distinctive features of McCarthy’s literary voice, so I will not spend time reiterating the various reasons McCarthy is important. Instead, let me emphasize one important feature: McCarthy’s unrelenting portrayal of good and evil, the beautiful and the horrific.

McCarthy’s villains are absolutely terrifying and downright compelling. Certain novels feature specific villainous characters in prominent roles, but none are as memorable as Judge Holden in Blood Meridian. To go into much detail would be pointless, you really need to experience the evil that this character exudes through the novel itself.

That said, let me assert that the Judge is eerily compelling, mostly because he is a realistic and depraved human taken to a mythological level. He embodies the evil innate in the human condition and forces those around him to confront it. His worldview is Enlightenment reason taken to a logical extreme which is why he boldly declares “Moral law is an invention of mankind for the disenfranchisement of the powerful in favor of the weak…A moral view can never be proven right or wrong by any ultimate test” (263).

The Judge is scary because he makes a lot of sense. Given the darkness of the world we live in, McCarthy’s villains are particularly frightening because they are so hard to disagree with. Evil, as portrayed in McCarthy, is not something to ignore. Yet, as Cosper writes, there is always a glimmer of hope. Phil Christman described McCarthy’s world as suggesting “a kind of Calvinism minus God” in a Books and Culture review, which is certainly accurate, though not necessarily the full story. McCarthy’s novels certainly portray darkness in such a manner, but by doing so they seem to be fashioned to suggest the need for something more. “This cannot be the whole picture,” readers think as they see the horrors committed by a Judge Holden or Anton Chigurh. If evil and brutality is shown explicitly in McCarthy’s novels, goodness and beauty shine all the brighter by comparison.

As Cosper aptly writes, McCarthy is not for everyone. His tamest books are still brutally honest about the violence that comes with the territory of his subject matter. Yet, for the reader willing to accept this, there is so much richness to be found in his works. If you have never read anything by him I recommend beginning with The Road or All the Pretty Horses, or, for the more daring reader, I strongly urge you to take on Blood Meridian, which I feel is McCarthy’s darkest but most important work. At the very least, watch the Coen brothers’ impressive 2007 adaptation of McCarthy’s No Country for Old Men for a taste of his unique voice.

Jake Slaughter is an editorial intern with Relief.

Sixteen (or so) Candles

Michael Dean Clark

Since this blog will publish on my birthday, I decided to make some wishes with it. Yes, I am aware that wishes made public supposedly won’t come true. And yet, wishes kept captive in the inner-recesses of my addled mind go nowhere anyway, so I feel safe in putting a few out there. And yes, I am also aware that making my wish list public might be taken as a tad self-serving. That’s because it is. And I’m ok with that.

Wish #1  This year, my 38th if you must know, I really hope to be found by a story that makes me feel so inferior I am compelled to write it. This is not because I have an inflated opinion of myself and my abilities. Rather, I want desperately to be stunned into the process of telling an amazing story that, for some reason or other, has not been told. I am convinced that it is not an artistic duty that drives story as much as it is the incumbent need to bear witness to the invisible.

Wish #2 Re: Wish #1 – Because so many stories worth telling get ignored for ones we’ve heard too many times before, my second wish is that anyone who ends up reading this blog will also be confronted with a story they must tell. If it happens, I’m hoping the candle I blew out with your name on it compels you to find the keyboard rather than think “Someone should really write about that.”

Wish #3 Re: Wish #1&2 – Because the desire to write a story is the response we SHOULD automatically heed, my third wish is that all of us who commit these stories to prose actually seek their publication so we are not the only ones who get the opportunity to experience them. Instead, I wish for all of these stories to eventually be submitted to various publications (and no, this is not me shoe-horning in two wishes, Jafar). If you’re not sure where to send the story you write, spend some time here.

Wish #4 And for my final wish, a little selfishness on my part (as if taking one more wish than the customary three is not selfish enough). I wish that all our stories find homes, bear witness, and inspire others to stand in the path of stories that will force them, in turn, to be witnesses themselves. 

So don’t let me down people. It is my birthday and all.

Michael Dean Clark is the fiction editor at Relief and an assistant professor of writing at Point Loma Nazarene University in San Diego, California. When he’s not writing or parenting via shame and sarcasm, Clark is waiting (im)patiently for the return of Psych, and you know that’s right.

“In Time” Out of Touch

Go to movie facebook pageLyle Enright likes his sci-fi a little more subtler.

I remember trying to work my way through John Bunyan’s Pilgrim’s Progress when I was much younger. I don’t remember a whole lot of the content, rather I recall the throbbing intellectual pain that comes with trying to process something way over your head way before your time.

I do, however, remember developing my first real appreciation for allegory based on the little I was able to get through, and by the time I finished Lewis’s Chronicles of Narnia I believed all the best stories in the world worked on that most noble of narrative devices.

I’ve been proved wrong since then, of course – it seems like we as a species are quickly losing our ability to speak in parables. George Romero’s Night of the Living Dead tetralogy notwithstanding, many attempts at modern allegory tend to fall short, the latest example being Andrew Niccol’s sci-fi thriller film In Time (2011). But in a very interesting twist, while the film bumbles over the sort of melodramatic dialogue that can only be acceptable to a sense of misplaced self-righteousness, it does bring up a number of interesting points.

At its core, the film is a very driven and well-intentioned treatise on social justice, something that we here at Relief care very much about. In this case, it’s in regard to the growing disparity between the rich and the poor when it comes to quality of life. In this not-too-distant-future, time is money – literally, it is currency. You get your first twenty-five years free and then (what a birthday present) your heart lights the fuse to a genetic time-bomb of sorts. Congratulations; you have a year left. Spend it and die, or work and earn your next sunrise.

Of course, if you’re a savvy capitalist, you can quickly make a minute last an hour. In fact, there are people who have literally millions of years stored up for themselves.

Hundreds of thousands of lifetimes that, in most cases, could have and originally did belong to other people.

There are some, though, who see something very wrong with a system that can turn out like this. Not least among them is Will Salas (Justin Timberlake) who, after receiving a “monetary” gift of astounding proportions and losing his mother at her last second, decides to take his new-found century and… What else? Overturn society, of course.

“For a few immortals to live, many people must die” – It’s a mantra that gets tossed around a lot in this film, and our Christ-given sense of justice should cringe accordingly. Who has that right, exactly? “No one,” the film answers, “And we’re going to fix it!”

…By enlisting the help of an impulsive socialite and holding up time banks at gunpoint and redistributing those eons to preachers, children and the downtrodden, apparently.

Truth be told, the situation doesn’t sound too far off from what we see in our own world today. “We are the ninety-nine percent!” – how often have we heard that recently? This is a film in which the ninety-nine percent fights back and literally dissolves the one percent among the masses. It’s a Robin Hood tale told by some of our most recognized actors. Subtle it is not, but it does get its point across.

The efficacy of that point, however, is another matter. It should set us on edge that this film’s idea of social justice essentially amounts to terrorism, and at several points we lean forward and expect that the protagonists are about to learn from the repercussions of their actions: among the first things anyone does after benefiting from Salas’s generous crime spree is to go out and buy a gun to defend themselves. Even the misguided paladin, Time Keeper Raymond Leon (Cillian Murphy) – yes, I gagged too, you are forgiven – has moments of very real wisdom and social consciousness. Yet he and everyone else who serves “The One Percent” gets what’s coming to them in the end; bad people are confirmed in their badness, good people remain responsible and, at least onscreen, incorruptible, and whether you’re bad or good is almost as simple as asking how rich you were at the beginning.

Every nationalist revolution in history, every change in power, every religion, every drama of government and society – not to mention the Gospel of Jesus Christ – will tell you that the whole question is far messier than that.

“What I tell you in the dark, speak in the daylight; what is whispered in your ear, proclaim from the roofs. Do not be afraid of those who kill the body but cannot kill the soul. Rather, be afraid of the One who can destroy both soul and body in hell. Are not two sparrows sold for a penny? Yet not one of them will fall to the ground apart from the will of your Father. And even the very hairs of your head are all numbered.” – Matthew 10:27-30

Lyle Enright is an editorial intern with Relief. He will graduate in English from Trinity University Illinois this May.

Page 2 of 25«12345»1020...Last »