Popular Culture Parenting: A Father’s Proudest Day

Henry Enthroned

Prompted by Brad’s excellent essay on The Office Nativity, Stephen Swanson reflects on a recent way that popular culture has adjusted his expectations of fatherhood and the potential for father/son relations.

The Greatest Parenting Tool Ever

When my wife and I were expecting our first child, Henry (now 2), we furiously searched for advice on the “must-haves” for parenting in the beginning of the new millennium.  Many friends had great advice, like “Don’t read ‘What to Expect…’ if you are prone to worry about unlikely things.”  Other sources, like the explosion of mommy-blogs and podcasts had great suggestions.  We turned to colleagues who had recently became parents for valuable hand-me-downs and suggestions, but the greatest piece of advice was this, “Get a DVR.  Just do it.”

I had scoffed at the TiVo craze.  I had laughed alone as comics made fun of the mascot and the schedules and the funny noises and suggestions that it made, but the DVR has saved our lives.  Not only can we tape all of our shows to watch when we want, but just like the commercial shows, when my son wants/needs attention, I can just pause the TV and read a story.  I had completely passed that off as drivel created to make customers think that this, but it works.  The most important use has been to always have a selection of beloved kids shows and movies on hand when needed. (There was a whole month where he raptly viewed the Pixar Shorts Collection, and you have no idea of the eternity that it can take to switch the TV to DVD, open the DVD, put in the DVD, wait through the intros, select “play”.)

“Oh No!”:  Things that I did not know at 2.

Because of the DVR, Henry has little knowledge of commercials.  Stories are cohesive and continuous, within his daily allotment of TV, and he seriously struggles when we watch live TV or Hulu.  Who are these women in white rooms who rub thing hands on table-tops?  The commercial comes on, and “Oh NOOOO! Where’d it go?”  Because of his online viewing, he also is familiar with “‘uffering” and has become adept at putting his finger on the touch-pad when the screen goes dim.

The Real Point of Pride

One word: “‘impsons”.  Yup, he loves it.  It beats Thomas, Yo Gabba Gabba, and Backyardigans out of the water.  All he needs to hear is the “doo DOO dee Doo” of Danny Elfman’s opening score, and he will run from any part of the house, and while we fast-forward through the Itchy and Scratchy cartoons, Henry finds the familiarity of the characters and objects in the show extremely exciting.  People “walk”, have “books”, ride “bikes”, and “animals” abound throughout every episode.

Henry was always a hesitant speaker and signer, but he happily describe the events of the latest “Simpsons”: laughing, kissing “oh no”-ing, and, yes, even “Ha-ha”ing along with Groening’s creations.  When the episode ends, he speaks and signs, “Dada…Mama, please more ‘impsons.  Please.”

As I tell my students, the power of visual narratives at their best is that they allow for both immediate identification and for depth and complexity as viewers engage with layers and layers of connectivity and meaning.  The best of popular culture, to which I believe the Simpsons has won a predominant place, holds the power to challenge and grow with us.  My pride is not just in his good taste that eschews the frustrating same-ness of children’s television for clever and subtle character and plot, but because Henry not only recognizes images but also cheers, “He did it!”, when Homer succeeds in stopping Bart from bringing down the school with the old Springfield Subway and gives him a hug, and how could any father not have their heart touched by that, least of a popular culture scholar.

No Comments

Which One Is Me?

Michael Dean Clark

This is the second of four entries on “being” a writer. The first can be found here.

I had a job interview recently in San Diego and while I was there I got a chance to have dinner with my sister Jeanette. She’s in the middle of reading my first novel length manuscript and spent a good ten minutes before the food came trying to confirm which real people from our past were basis for my characters.

Tommy is totally Rob Machado.

Nope.

Well, Craig is you, isn’t he?

No, I see myself more as Bibs. (I should note that most people who’ve read the book think Craig is my alter, so they may be right. However, it really throws them when I say I identify more with Bibs, a deacon’s daughter turned prostitute and right-hand woman of the local pimp/drug dealer Marley Bob).

Well, what about BT?

She got him right, sort of. By the end of the conversation, I realized I really like this game. As a writer, I freely admit I crib the lives of the people around me. If you know me, I’m probably going to use a part of you. Writers don’t invent, we compile and alter and then graft what we’ve taken onto the pieces of ourselves we put into every person we “create.” We mix and match like the socks we don’t think people will ever see us wearing.

But the conversation of “who” my characters are is really interesting to me because I generally don’t know who I’ve composited until it gets pointed out to me. I think that may be one of the reasons I choose to do something as frustrating and low-paying as write fiction without wizards or vampires. I like the way something so personal only makes sense to me when other people explain its facets as they see them.

I even like when people get my stories “wrong” because explaining my intentions has a similar effect. I guess I could never be Emily Dickinson. I can’t write for myself and my four walls. I need feedback earlier than a posthumous release would allow.

Michael Dean Clark is an author of fiction and nonfiction and is in the final stages of earning a Ph.D. in Creative Writing at the University of Milwaukee-Wisconsin. His work is set primarily in his hometown of San Diego and has been known to include pimps in diapers, heroin-addicted pastors who suffer from OCD, and possibly the chupacabra.

1 Comment

Photo Haiku Wednesday 3.17.10

Photo courtesy of Michelle Pendergrass.

Directions:

1. Write a haiku inspired by the photo and post it in the comments.

For extra chances to win:

2. Follow @reliefjournal on Twitter

3. Follow @Quo Vadis on Twitter

4. Twitter @reliefjournal with your haiku and #PHW (Photo Haiku Wednesday)

* * *

The good people over at Quo Vadis have generously donated some prizes!!

The weekly winner will receive a Quo Vadis Habana Journal and a bottle of J. Herbin ink!!

Every week Relief will choose a random winner! So play along and tell your friends. See the information below for extra chances to win.

* * *

Winner will be announced via Twitter Thursday afternoons.

We can only ship to U.S. addresses right now.

You may only win once every three months, but you may play along every week for Twitter Super Bonus Points.

* * *

Would you like to have your photo featured on Photo Haiku Wednesday?

Email your photos to Michelle: photohaiku@reliefjournal.com

You’ll get a photo credit link here on the main blog and you’ll also be entered in the drawing for the Quo Vadis Habana journal and bottle of J. Herbin ink the week your photo appears on the blog!

6 Comments

Dr. Strangewrite or: How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the eBook

Ian David Philpot

Web Editor Ian David Philpot addresses the topic of eBooks from the perspective of an undergraduate student looking to become an author immediately after graduation in eight weeks.

I have two bookshelves from IKEA that take up a lot of space in my room. They are wonderful and everything I had ever wanted from a book-holding structure, but they are also very full.

My girlfriend, who bought me the first of the two bookshelves, recently asked me if I wanted a Kindle for graduation. My immediate response was “no.” I mean, how could I stand to ever read a novel from anything but an actual book? As an aspiring author, the thought of eBooks is nauseating. When I get a hold of a published copy of my first novel, I want to feel the pages, not the pixels. I want to breathe in the stories just by smelling the physical object in my hand. (Have you ever tried to sniff your computer screen? I tried it once. Apparently there was some static build up on the screen. I got zapped.)

I’m also aware of the large stigma attached to “online only” publications. Don’t get me wrong, there are some I follow very closely because I know who the editors are, but a majority of the literary community is concerned about the quality being produced by online only journals. And if someone happens to read a story they don’t like from one online only publisher, they may forever be turned off to the idea.

It’s Not Easy Being Green

Parts of me wants to have an eBook reader: the tech savvy part, the part of me that can never convince myself to grab a book on the way out the door because I want to travel light, and the environmentally conscious part. That last part is where my biggest struggle exists.

I want to do everything I can to help out with the environment. I turn off the faucet when I brush my teeth. I take home plastic bottles from work, because my day job doesn’t have a recycling system. These are little things, I know, but I like to think they’re helping out. So what if I didn’t have to buy any more books at all? (Textbooks especially.)

NPR and CPR or: eBook Bound

Then NPR posted a link on Facebook to Lynn Neary’s article “No Ink, No Paper: What’s the Value of an eBook?” I was scared when I started reading.  What if I finally write something good and it’s never actually printed on paper? What if Richard Stallman gets a hold of it and starts distributing it for free? What if my book never makes any money? I dropped my laptop and ran to find a paper bag to stop from hyperventilating.

When I regained consciousness… Okay, so maybe I didn’t really pass out, but I did freak out. What right did NPR have of presenting me with the harshness of reality? I was so upset, I went back to the article to read the rest. And a peace came over me when Neary quoted Chris Dannen, a freelance writer:

“If you have iTunes selling your books, you have this entire store right on everyone’s desktop and you can expose them to a lot more,” Dannen says. “You can just get them into the habit of buying books, and more importantly, you make the whole process of buying completely frictionless.”

iTunes–where I spend over $100 a year buying music–could be selling my book to anyone near a computer? How could I not like that idea?

So Erin, if you’re reading this, I’ll have the Kindle with a side of eBooks, please.

***

NOTE: Relief will not be abandoning the printed form anytime in the foreseeable future. Our eBooks are available on Scribd.

***

Ian David Philpot is studying English at Northern Illinois University and spent one year in Columbia College Chicago’s Fiction Writing program.  He writes fiction, poetry, and music.   Ian prefers black to white, vanilla to chocolate, and only eats yellow cake.

, , , , , , , ,

3 Comments

The Delivery Will Be Televised: The Office & The Pop Culture Birth Narrative

Brad Fruhauff has no illusions about children. Pictured here being whacked by his own son.

Brad Fruhauff has no illusions about babies

In a special “Saturday Edition” of our blog, Brad Fruhauff has good things to say about the birth of Pam and Jim’s child on The Office in context of our popular notions of childbirth.

The Genre of Birth Narrative

Until my wife and I got pregnant, we had not given any more thought than the average person to the phenomenon of the American birth narrative. Yet when the instructor of our childbirth class complained about all the “crisis” births on TV and in the movies, I instantly knew what she meant.

We all know what a birth “looks like” – that is, on TV. The father becomes a frantic, bumbling mess; the family is so excited they only get in the way of the parents’ “private” experience; the mother becomes a monster who abuses her husband, renounces sex, and screams like a banshee while pushing the baby out. Once the baby is born all the drama is effectively over and the family gathers around the beatific parents and shares a tender moment (perhaps peppered with a few gags).

This kind of drama and comedy makes for good TV, and it would be fruitless and perhaps irrelevant to complain that it is unrealistic, but surely it is pitiable that such a farce is the primary image many of us have of childbirth. Parody is most effective when the thing parodied is well-known, but since birth has moved out of the everyday and into the hospitals, most of us have to wait until we have our own children to appreciate the distance between the parody and the reality.

Re-Imagining Birth

That’s one reason I appreciated the recent birth episodes of The Office. While participating in the familiar genre, they also manage to present a more nuanced and, to me, emotionally satisfying birth story than even such great shows as Mad About You.

One important way they manage this is by refusing to let Pam act like the roaring, demon-possessed woman from The Exorcist. Instead she remains mostly calm and self-possessed throughout the hours leading up to the delivery.

She and Jim disagree and bicker throughout the episode, but it is about something plausible and partially external – their conflicting desires to deliver the baby safely and to maximize their poor HMO benefits. The narrative acquires dramatic tension because it respects both these desires rather than placing us viewers in a superior position of the “rational ones.”

Though Jim does become the “crazy father,” it’s less due to genre expectations than his valid concern for Pam and the baby. In fact, part of what is both funny and poignant is precisely how uncomfortable Jim is with his own anxiety. Used to being in control of himself, he finds suddenly that he is subject to Pam’s stronger will.

We do have a dysfunctional family in the Dunder-Mifflin crew themselves, but perhaps just because they are not biological family, the moments when they escape their own self-involvement to show kindness or concern have a sweetness to them.

The Deliver Will (Not) Be Televised

But the most important factor may be the naturalistic style in which The Office is filmed. The very premise of the camera crew existing within the story we are watching gives the show many of its characteristic features, including and especially the self-awareness of the fact of being filmed – for the characters as well as the viewers. Thus, when it comes time for the actual birth, the show goes against all dramatic logic and denies us entry to the delivery room because we are not family.

We are not totally cut off – Michael’s presumptive intimacy with his employees takes him to the delivery room door often enough to let us hear Pam’s groaning (not screaming, significantly) and then the baby’s first cries, but the show forfeits the dramatic potential of being in the room itself for the sake of its own commitment to representing these characters as people like us who live in a world like ours – a world where you don’t let strangers into your delivery room.

The intrusive presence of the cameras is mirrored in Michael’s and the others’ sometimes oppressive presence around the couple. When Pam becomes afraid of having the baby and Jim comforts her, they are also surrounded by Michael and Kevin, who second and comment upon everything Jim says. It’s certainly funny, but as the camera zooms in tight on this huddle of people, it also reveals that our presence is no less strange than Kevin’s – perhaps moreso, in fact.

The naturalistic camera, finally, dispels the sentimentalism of the “happy family” moment. Jim, Pam, and the baby do share a quiet, tender moment together, but that’s all it is – no soft piano music, no framing them in an idyllic tableau.

What I appreciated most was the time they spent after the birth – the birth was only the first climax of a two-part episode. Afterward, we see Jim and Pam adapting to this new little person, particularly with respect to nursing and sleeping. My son had similar trouble nursing at first, and I felt the show captured, in its brief and subtle way, many of the strange emotions this evokes: worry, sadness, doubt, shame, and finally joy and relief.

One last thought: these episodes contained muted critiques of insurance companies and hospitals that would certainly resonate with a certain kind of parent (like my wife and I). I’m of two minds whether this was simply part of the show’s naturalism or was an intrusion of an agenda. I’d like to think that such reimaginations of the birth narrative don’t have to come at someone’s expense, but one could just as easily argue that denying the economic factors of birth (which are many) would only reinscribe the romanticization of our existing narratives.

So, while this isn’t a “perfect” birth story, it does begin to show us that birth can be dramatic, sweet, exciting, and funny without becoming farce and so is really a very fine birth narrative.

***

Brad Fruhauff is Poetry Editor for Relief. His poetry and book, film, and music reviews have appeared occasionally in small press or online journals such as Salt and Burnside Writers Collective. His story, “The Strangler,” appeared in the first issue of Ankeny Briefcase. He currently lives in Evanston, IL, and teaches college English.

,

1 Comment

White Sheep, Black Sheep: The Literary Kinship of Emily Dickinson and Edna St. Vincent Millay

Brad Fruhauff (pictured in hat)

Brad Fruhauff considers the ways unlikely things can come together in the works of two American poets.

It’s possible to look too closely at a poem. As Billy Collins exhorts his students, one should “waterski / across the surface of a poem” rather than tie it down and “torture a confession out of it.” When I teach a new poet I’m just as likely as my students to become consumed with understanding “what’s going on” in a poem; it takes some cultivating to give yourself the freedom to hear and feel a poem at the same time as you’re deciphering its explicit content.

The atrophy of our culture’s ability to range freely within a poem is perhaps a topic for another blog (you might read Dana Gioia’s essay, “Can Poetry Matter?”). My thoughts turned to this while seeking a subject for this blog. I started paging through my Norton Anthology of American Literature, from which I’ve been teaching this semester, and read over the selections on Edna St. Vincent Millay. These poems had caught my attention already for their ability to combine a modern candor and explicitness (e.g., female sexuality) withing the traditional form of the sonnet. But reading them again I found myself improbably comparing them to none other than Emily Dickinson.

This is an unlikely matching in terms of personality. Millay was a bohemian of the early-20th century while Dickinson was a proper Puritan of the mid-18th century. Millay apparently had a sexually “open” marriage while Dickinson lived a hermitic, single life and hardly had any male friends outside her father and brother. Millay was a kind of “bad girl” of American poetry even as Dickinson was being blessed as one of its most important early voices.

But I think there is a more than intuitive connection between the two. Consider these lines from Millay:

I, that had been to you, had you remained,
But one more waking from a recurrent dream,
Cherish no less the certain stakes I gained,
And walk your memory’s halls, austere, supreme,
A ghost in marble of a girl you knew
Who would have loved you in a day or two.

(“I Think I Should Have Love You Presently”)

There’s a powerful, assertive “I” speaking, and yet that self is not so stable or concrete that she can’t inhabit another’s consciousness or see herself as if from a distance. Then there’s the surprise ending that has a tinge of sadness to it; one could almost see one of Dickinson’s characteristic dashes setting it up, as in “I heard a fly buzz – when I died.” Like Millay’s, Dickinson’s spirit roams at whim between worlds (the physical and metaphysical, in this case) yet remains a powerful “I,” capable of dying and resurrecting, communing with nature and with other souls. And just as Millay plays with the sonnet, Dickinson plays with the sing-song meters of hymns:

I died for beauty, but was scarce
Adjusted in the tomb,
When one who died for truth was lain
In an adjoining room.

(“I died for beauty”)

Both poets find it unremarkable that they should be ephemeralized, that their minds and bodies might be divided – in fact, they own it and find agency in it: Millay “cherish[es] . . . the stakes I gained” and Dickinson goes on to speak with the other body and to find common cause. Body and mind join up again at poem’s end in an image as melancholy as Millay’s:

And so, as kinsmen met a night,
We talked between the rooms,
Until the moss had reached our lips,
And covered up our names.

The moss silences the bodies and erases their names, removing them from the human world, just as Millay’s woman who would have loved the man “in a day or two” only lives in a possible world other than this real one.

Millay also shares a certain allegorical imagination with Dickinson, exploring the imaginative potential of a metaphorical comparison or personification. In “I Too beneath Your Moon, Almighty Sex,” Millay apostrophizes “almighty Sex” itself, something often associated with odes. She admits that she “go[es] forth at nightfall crying like a cat” and abandoning “the lofty tower” that she labored to make of her life. Desire and character conflict in this odd juxtaposition of medieval architecture with an urban alley at night, and that tension motivated an explanation or defense:

Such as I am, however, I have brought
To what it is, this tower; it is my own;
Though it was reared To Beauty, it was wrought
From what I had to build with: honest bone
Is there, and anguish; pride; and burning thought;
And lust is there, and nights not spent alone.

Whatever we might think of Millay’s personal life, we can appreciate her candor even as it is restrained by her choice of form and allegory. Indeed, Millay’s honest admission of the power of sex and lust is just the kind of thing that makes us Reliefers feel at home. Literature, after all, as C.S. Lewis said, reminds us we are not alone (though maybe not in Millay’s sense).

Dickinson treats something similar when she writes, “The Soul selects her own Society – / Then – shuts the Door – .” We seek intimacy in many forms. And again Dickinson’s poem ends with a surprise heaviness that hits with a similar emotional power as Millay’s as she explores this personification of the soul (“her,” below):

I’ve known her – from an ample nation -
Choose One -
Then – close the Valves of her attention -
Like Stone -

Millay’s tower “To Beauty” is made of less than beautiful things, and the soul’s intimacy in Dickinson becomes a kind of stone tomb. The differences between the two woman are still marked – Millay’s voice is far more personal, more desperate, more borne down upon by a chaotic world without a center, while Dickinson begins her adventures with some sense of having a safe home to return to – but both wrestle with the tensions between different worlds they belong to and compellingly represent this through putting pressure on inherited forms.

The result in reading both is a sense of something both familiar and wonderfully strange, something ordered and yet brimming with an anarchical energy that thrills us even as we are glad it is contained.

, , , ,

1 Comment

Photo Haiku Wednesday 3.10.10

Photo courtesy of Stephanie Kasan.

Directions:

1. Write a haiku inspired by the photo and post it in the comments.

For extra chances to win:

2. Follow @reliefjournal on Twitter

3. Follow @Quo Vadis on Twitter

4. Twitter @reliefjournal with your haiku and #PHW (Photo Haiku Wednesday)

* * *

The good people over at Quo Vadis have generously donated some prizes!!

The weekly winner will receive a Quo Vadis Habana Journal and a bottle of J. Herbin ink!!

Every week Relief will choose a random winner! So play along and tell your friends. See the information below for extra chances to win.

* * *

Winner will be announced via Twitter Thursday afternoons.

We can only ship to U.S. addresses right now.

You may only win once every three months, but you may play along every week for Twitter Super Bonus Points.

* * *

Would you like to have your photo featured on Photo Haiku Wednesday?

Email your photos to Michelle: photohaiku@reliefjournal.com

You’ll get a photo credit link here on the main blog and you’ll also be entered in the drawing for the Quo Vadis Habana journal and bottle of J. Herbin ink the week your photo appears on the blog!

7 Comments

Deleted Scene: The Scar

Lisa Ohlen Harris

Lisa Ohlen Harris provides us with a short passage that didn’t make it into her forthcoming book Through the Veil. (This post first appeared on her website LisaOhlenHarris.com.)

I stayed home with the baby that night. I must have fallen asleep on the sofa, because when I woke about midnight, Todd wasn’t home yet. The gathering at the Manning’s house must have run late, I thought.

While I was putting on pajamas and brushing my teeth, Todd was helping Tim out of the wrecked taxi. A couple of Arab shabab stopped at the scene of the accident to ask if they could help; they took Tim to the emergency room to have his head sewn shut.

When they left the Manning’s house, the guys had waved down a taxi. Tim sat in the front seat, because his Arabic was better than Todd’s. There was a seat belt on the passenger’s side, Tim remembered later, but it was grimy and dusty. He thought briefly that he should put it on anyway, but pushed the thought away knowing that the driver would interpret this as an insult to his driving—and a lack of trust in the will of God.

Todd woke me up when he finally got home, early in the morning. It was still dark, but I remember hearing the birds sing outside our bedroom window. When I turned on a lamp, I saw blood all over Todd’s sandals and a deep gash between his toes, almost splitting his foot for an inch or so. It should have been sutured, but he hadn’t noticed his own injury while he was at the hospital with Tim. Todd’s wound took weeks to heal, and he still has the scar. It’s easy to hide under socks and shoes.

We didn’t see Tim over the weekend, and when he came to the language school that Monday he had a big piece of gauze taped over the wound. When his forehead healed enough he took gauze off, but it wasn’t until the sutures were removed that we all saw the jagged crescent.

———-

So there’s the “deleted scene.” The guys were in a taxi crash. Tim hurt his head and ended up with a crescent-shaped scar. It’s kinda interesting, but so what? I mean, really, why would this story matter to anyone but our family and Tim’s? I might tell about the accident when we get the old gang together, sure, but that doesn’t mean it’s book-worthy.

As I assembled my chapters for Through the Veil, I wanted each memory, each chapter to say something more than, “This happened then that happened, now isn’t the Middle East exotic?”

Ultimately, the taxi accident memory just didn’t make the cut.

***

Lisa Ohlen Harris is Relief’s Creative Nonfiction editor. Her Middle East memoir, Through the Veil, will be published by Canon Press in 2010. Lisa’s essays have appeared in journals like River TeethArts & Letters, and The Laurel Review, and have received special mention in Pushcart Prize XXXIII: Best of the Small Presses (2009) and in Best American Spiritual Writing (2008 and 2010). Lisa enjoys mentoring and editing the work of emerging writers through her critique service.

, , ,

No Comments

My Emerging Tendencies

Michael Dean Clark

This is the first in a series of four entries on “being” a writer.

I’ve spent the last four years completely committed to becoming a published author and yet only recently come to terms with calling myself a writer when people ask what I do for work. Even though I’ve written since I was young, saying it out loud (and claiming it as a vocation no less) has always felt a bit presumptuous and a lot bougie. And then there’s the inevitable follow-up question:

What’s your book called?

Um, I don’t have one. Until a couple years ago, I didn’t have a single fiction credit to my name. The awkward moment that follows generally ends with another question, or really, variations on the same question:

So what do you really do? Oh, so what’s your day job then? So, writing’s a hobby then? Where does your money come from?

Since drug sales and exotic dancing don’t seem to be acceptable answers to those questions, I’ve been obliged to tell people I teach writing and am working on a terminal degree (anyone else think that a Ph.D. and cancer sharing an adjective is odd?). And then the nod comes. You know, the head bob that says, Oh, you’re a loser.

Recently, however, I’ve had a couple pieces published and some “encouraging” agent rejection letters. As a result, I find myself described in a new way. Now, I’m not a loser, I’m an “emerging writer.” I am troubled by this title as well. Am I a grizzly rolling out of months of winter hibernation? Am I a developing nation? The consensus seems to be that I’m somewhere between caterpillar and butterfly, which in my estimation makes me that nasty, gray chrysalis from which a living creature may or may not spring.

If you think I’m wrong, try out the following:

Sir, you’re going to need triple bypass heart surgery. But don’t worry; one of our brightest emerging surgeons will perform the procedure.

I know you’re on trial for murder, but you’ve got an emerging public defender representing you.     

When I think about the idea of emergence, I immediately want another title. I’m trying a few out. Tell me what you think.

I am under-published. I am material heavy and publication light. I’m very market selective. My readership is still on an indie level. Commercial success isn’t all that important. My family likes some of what I write and you should too. If I’m not the next “it” writer, I feel safe saying I could be the next “that” writer.

That last one seems a bit long and probably wouldn’t go over well on a resume. Maybe the one before it too.

I guess I just want to feel less like a fraud when I call myself a writer. Then again, if great novelists like J.D. Salinger, Harper Lee, and Lauren Conrad from The Hills never settled comfortably into the title, maybe I shouldn’t expect too either.

Michael Dean Clark is an author of fiction and nonfiction and is in the final stages of earning a Ph.D. in Creative Writing at the University of Milwaukee-Wisconsin. His work is set primarily in his hometown of San Diego and has been known to include pimps in diapers, heroin-addicted pastors who suffer from OCD, and possibly the chupacabra.

6 Comments

Photo Haiku Wednesday 3.3.10

Photo courtesy of Stephanie Kasan.

Directions:

1. Write a haiku inspired by the photo and post it in the comments.

For extra chances to win:

2. Follow @reliefjournal on Twitter

3. Follow @Quo Vadis on Twitter

4. Twitter @reliefjournal with your haiku and #PHW (Photo Haiku Wednesday)

* * *

The good people over at Quo Vadis have generously donated some prizes!!

The weekly winner will receive a Quo Vadis Habana Journal and a bottle of J. Herbin ink!!

Every week Relief will choose a random winner! So play along and tell your friends. See the information below for extra chances to win.

* * *

Winner will be announced via Twitter Thursday afternoons.

We can only ship to U.S. addresses right now.

You may only win once every three months, but you may play along every week for Twitter Super Bonus Points.

* * *

Would you like to have your photo featured on Photo Haiku Wednesday?

Email your photos to Michelle: photohaiku@reliefjournal.com

You’ll get a photo credit link here on the main blog and you’ll also be entered in the drawing for the Quo Vadis Habana journal and bottle of J. Herbin ink the week your photo appears on the blog!

1 Comment